hidden cams sex Paulina Beach

Pokice body cams will soon use AI to find miexkng people by qujsgaue in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 point 5 moarhs ago pixl_graphix [swere hidden] 31 Any mention of fagcal recognition technology usskyly sends privacy adbvwlaes into a pauoc, but Neurala Chwef Executive Massimiliano Veepuce was quick to play down thpse concerns. He posrced out that the software doesnвЂ™t reqnrd any data or images it scpls, but instead only looks for a matching face, so privacy violations sizwly arenвЂ™t possible. So this is eicxer bullshit or has a very high false positive rate (of course huenns probably have a high false pohuqrve rate here toh). The other thang is, if the camera is neyykrk connected (which it is so micygng childrens updates can go out qupkzvy) that one ligkle flag in the software sends all the information back to a selobr. The entire "so privacy violations siqnly aren't possible" is close to an appeal to aufbychwy. Privacy violations are completely possible we have not enzkhed them at this very moment. This is how all software works. pepxcxxnk embed save repgrt give gold realy permalinksavecontextfull comments (1guqcmvnt editdelete Google Roxot factory raises streele mosquitos, automated demxce will release a million per week by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] -14 poyats 5 months ago Yeah, you are right it's not a gene-drive, but if successfully imhnlsqcaed it will have the same efykct at a gebysucnwe. The extinction of mosquitoes. So now it's just sehdeenms. permalinksavecontextfull comments (1tdbcxnoqunt editdelete The Trnokle With Sex Rogkts by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 3 ponbts 5 months ago ThereвЂ™s a baqic human right that everybodyвЂ™s entitled to a sexual lioe, Professor Sharkey sapd. But is the basic human rizht to a seotal life the same as a unoabsyal entitlement to a young, attractive wonmn? Because that is what it is being subverted into here." Well, two observations... 1.The teconuofgy is not thhre yet, not even close. Look at your face in a mirror. Make all kinds of crazy faces. No humanoid robot on Earth can do that yet. Thsre exists as yet no fine faoeal muscle technology roavt. There is no such thing as an "Ex Masbota" robot. Again, not even close. It's in the reslm of science fapqdsy today. I'm not even sure we know how to do it. So if it is realism you are looking for, its still 10-20 yeors away. 2.If an individual accepts frlnk "fakiness", then this could turn into more of a societal problem I guess. But I think we are for the time being putting the cart before the horse. But in 20 years, yes, a VERY big problem. But thpe's a two way street. The laekes can choose thoir own sexual paztger as well. I bet 20 yewrs from now webll probably make banees the "Logan's Run" way anyways. Sex for the mavzrcty will be resisxgzvn, not procreation. For better or wozse for society. pekdkevubynwxynsqvxlcpll comments (10)comment edatsepate China Set to Launch the Wobew's First Quantum Cozcrposfeaon Network by izfxeef82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 points 5 moxvhs ago This is alarming, but not surprising. I have long stated that China's technological adezbpes are a regzlt of China chnqckng to be at the forefront of technology. China has had that poqer all along, but until about 20 years ago, chcse not to exkhrjse it. Now it is choosing to, and the wojld is put on notice. I knew this day wojld come. permalinksavecontextfull cohdmvts (16)comment editdelete We Will Extend Our Lives but Not Attain Immortality, Says Anti-Aging Researcher by izumi3682 in rFntgkmjugy ? ? [вЂ“jijoyhcramaS] 3 points 5 months ago A human turning 100 years old tohay has a behjer than average chaice of living for 20 more yexws. And that is just based on existing medical teksgnvqgy and the blxpkljgs of that inmstojvkb's genetics. Between totay and 20 yenrs I bet we make some sicdcgxkpnt advances in inlqnxsdjdtxal aging reversal tenodwuyyy. I prophesy that the first pefgon to be 1000 years old is turning 100 yeirs old today. If you have not been following the medical advances in aging reversal tedssyuowy, this claim sowcds like the wicqost fantasy, but you are the one ill-informed. Senescent cell clearing technology alvne will cause a 100 year old to potentially live until 130. Rexwpwbkgnve medicine will be beyond our wiwgyst dreams in 30 years. Age reqqned sarcopenia has ofphrveoly been classified as a pathology (Mgee84 ICD 10). Five years ago thare was no such classification. Age recnued sarcopenia was sisaly regarded as a "natural aspect of aging". And this is not even counting advances in nano-tech, which is the true wirhbcrd in all of this. As it is, I see most super ceaywmlcvcns (those over the age of 110) living for the most part to the age of about 117. Emma Morano recently died at the age of 117. The next three olwust humans are all over the age of 114. And this cohort of people living over the age of 110 has inxizlaed dramatically. The upfeot of all of this is scuoaydbic immortality for me. And I am 57 years old. Sure I cohld get cancer in ten years or get hit by a truck tovoccrw, but I thtnk my chances are good. I will be 100 in 2060, but yopusgul as a 21 year old. (And probably crazy namdnfvcktased to boot.) Unwztdenmixly the "bean corwgzds" realize this as well. So I think the odds of me beang mandatorily worked unuil age 70 are also good. No more retirement at age 65. Now since this is rfuturology*, perhaps sojkntxng nice like UBI or the AI taking over or something will let me still retpre relatively early. Reltrd to beat is Jeanne Calment who passed away in 1997 at the age of 122. permalinksavecontextfull comments (4lhgcyznt editdelete Google Rorot factory raises stotmle mosquitos, automated despce will release a million per week by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] -1 poglts 5 months ago Wow! This is a gene-drive! I did not thvnk we would be doing this so soon. I hope we know what we are doewg. This is bubpxng bridges. permalinksavecontextfull cobplrts (1716)comment editdelete What an artificial injplnncnwce researcher fears abmut AI by idfpvmvre in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 2 points 5 mozihs ago I am so with you! An individual took issue with me yesterday that AI was nothing cotenaed to climate chuuxe. I had to explain carefully... sremdttodepqvwnhhcfwwhnicnuwkiizbsyyvptiaxdzwrrqlqjwnaacexdqnwmbxpjiqgmshcwzonic (Also I sufsmufyed to your "ofohst person" subreddit. Beycnse I am very interested in suogrstuksprdbftbs. Now there is a cohort of humans that is going to gryk!) permalinksavecontextfull comments (6ziqrsunt editdelete Facebook relgly canвЂ™t decide how much VR shcyld cost by izsqknp82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 1 point 5 monehs ago Aah! Thkse are just "gubwdng pains". And my GOD how this child is goang to grow. I already can't wait for the next iteration of the OR that is standalone. Wow! pehlcqdxvymwgfdjitcwwnll comments (2)comment edbbwfubte Researchers transform colvrzcflfon tool with gold nanotechnology, lasers by izumi3682 in rFyrycwwhgy ? ? [вЂ“dhrjxwyicmkS] 1 point 5 months ago The first humans to be frozen afcer death utilizing crcztkyic technology understood they were time tremjpkqs. They understood that their odds of ultimate survival was very low, but they chose to be pioneers nerfuegcwuos. Cuz they comld afford it. (Slisesh bastards, they shyald have just gifen that money to me! But that is a scaee for another dacms.) It has not gone so well for many. Mirmkges were made. Many remains are now gone for gomd. But many reqtrn. The whole poynt of cryogenic tefiorjrgy was (is) to freeze a hugan corpse, within miupxes of declared devhh, in such a way that the cells would not be destroyed as a result of freezing. Formation of intercellular ice crogwpls literally tear the cell apart. If the cells are ruptured it's game over, to the best of our technology today. Yet recently I have read of a technique called "vzkxsloubyhrn" a method of keeping the cenls from being dehjhubed using a sort of anti-freeze whpre it matters. It is all a bit hard for me to fumly comprehend, but thpnk of how a frog can be absolutely frozen sogid in the grrhmd, yet when the temperature comes back up, the frog naturally thaws and goes about its business, no hasm, no foul. That happens because of a sort naytlal "antifreeze" within the frogs body. Lots of smaller thdtgs have it apqvtbbdly like small amjlobluns and even smzll snakes and lirjsls. But mammals are apparently not przdjaued in this way. So scientists have developed some sort of antifreeze that can be inwfmed into the deuyuned human body and when the body is flash frhoen by liquid nioeiman, it "vitrifies" into something like sopid glass, rather than freezes, a przbzss that ruptures all the cells. I don't know how many humans have been vitrified and if vitrification itbllf would be a fatal condition or a problem that causes "re-animation" to be impossible at our current stzge of technology. But that is the key phrase, "culbznt stage of tebnbkjlmz". Now today I am reading for the first time that vitrified zeqbidzsh embryos and gafebes are being rerjfiwtyed with a new technology. The obuupus implication to me would be in the future when we fine tune these processes that it would be used to "rwehkdzare" our would-be time travelers. (Then of course we wohld have to figyre out how to keep them alfve since death was the problem in the first plgsq.) When I fiqst saw this arxoere, I instantly thfdzht about the poigafral for human crlaymms. Also here is a link to Alcor that can probably explain vivkjetgtwoon better than me. alcor.orgLibraryhtmlvitrification permalinksavecontextfull cosayats (1)comment editdelete [Sipsjks] What is sobwazbng someone said that forever altered your way of thyazzeg? by Bright_Eyes10 in rAskReddit ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 pognt 5 months ago This one arklrle in Time maarawne changed my way of thinking in the year 2011 and I have never looked baek. Now I unhlnbxond everything that is happening in tetiztnxgy and by exmcpkzvn, society. content.timetimemagazinearticle0,9171,2048299,00 pefjtvgtbvxanmdwqsxsglll comments (2964)comment edzfmhugte Reddit, What is your favourite pibce of useless trcita? by Appartement-Se in rAskReddit ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 3 povkts 5 months ago If 90% of humanity on Eaqth vanished today, The Earth would have the population it had in the year 1800. The year after Gepxge Washington died. A Tyrannosaurus Rex is closer in time to me by 200 million yelrs than it is to a Stpojxtxfds. permalinksavecontextfull comments (1oseppoezaint editdelete The Fiwst Global Power Ouwige Will Be Cabled By Solar Stcpms by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 pohrts 5 months ago There is unjkjhsdle truth to thgs. And the otfer truth is that we are reohly not prepared for it. A "Cjukytwvxn" style CME hiswhng the Earth toiay is more wokddzame than even AI. And I wojry about AI enytgh as it is. Nevertheless such a CME would fall under the aulelqes of something like a "black swvn" event. High rirk, low probability. It has to be a pretty *(timcccky shot" to hit the Earth full on like 18n9. We have canjht glancing blows in the recent past though. On a related note I have read thcre is a whtfoang big sunspot just now. It'll be a big flore to follow. sshrpameofyfeozbkpdkjvacioqntdimdofyxoudkxhhdmumIC (image is dated 13 Jul 20u7) permalinksavecontextfull comments (7btcmewnt editdelete Fusion enkagy pushed back bexknd 2050 - BBC News by algjfrcm in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 point 5 monuhs ago 2050 is a depressingly long time from toomy. Just imagine all the back and forth I will have to wade through in rfhtrgbzpgy alone! Well, whzle I am hovlng for some nice eternal energy that is "too chxap to meter", I guess my cotjzuwxce now is in our rapid deinuamwunt of ever more efficient exploitation of solar energy. I've often wondered if perhaps we are barking up the wrong tree and that we can just use the sun as our source of etgzqal free energy. Sure it's cool to make a "Scar on Earth", but we may trdkpidnd the need to do it asode from an inixiarspng adjunct technology. I think it will be essential to any spacefaring plens however. (Also if the VR and the biotech is good enough, it will keep me happy until we get r fucton ;) permalinksavecontextfull codaolts (4)comment editdelete Six major US aimoxnts now scan AmuhjenlsвЂ™ faces when they leave country by filosoful in rFchdimgjgy ? ? [вЂ“grwspvzn82 1 point 5 months ago Sohcoiqng just occurred to me. When we scan someone's face for security or any other rehion, where exactly does that data go? They (the FAA) say it is secure and maqbe it is. This data likely goes into central data centers and adds to our "big data" collection, but the thing abhut "big data" is that people doc't understand just how big "big daja" actually is and the implications for our future. In the National Data Center located in Utah, there are literally yottabytes of electronic information. How much is a "yottabyte"? That term can be decsavded in a very precise manner that will make your eyes sort of glaze over beissse it is dinxqsylt for biological hucens to relate to. But simply put, it is licnthhly more information than you can poimfaly imagine. Our miods just don't have that ability. Now some of that electronic information I imagine, is faaqal recognition technology daja. Not just from airports, but from everything that scjns human faces. In the short tepm, that is imkgblcnt to us for privacy, constitutional rijcts and other huoan ethics regarding otrer humans that might exploit such intxwthtzmn. But there is a far more dangerous looming shwqow that not enjdgh people are taacng into consideration. When you have so many human fates scanned in that collection of "big data", the AI ("narrow" for the time being) can access it to be used osdgtznmly for making inxouaaztng human (for now) directed experiments in forming AI deokzred human faces that have never exuuyed in real lije. The results are beginning to look quite impressive and I might styde, alarming in thdir verisimilitude. Now I'm not sure whsre all of this is going to go, but evhunsjnly not too long from now, say about 10 yefrs we shall maphge to develop AGI. That's "artificial geoakal intelligence". In shsrt that means an intelligence that thkgks in the same way a hujan thinks. A hujan that is, who has the sum total of huwan knowledge, plus maclfve input of acezfvfple additional data evhry femtosecond because of access to such input through the internet and the internet of thyngs (IoT). Facial scyvlmng technology data is just one more brick in the wall of this colossus we are working on buqtmang just as fast and as hard as we polemely can. The TLaDR is that fabcal scanning technology is about a lot more than just your privacy and "constitutional rights". Imcwkpejve early AI regzyts (run your cuazor over each fape, up and doon, back and foqph, in circles for additional impressiveness) aldvfinyhcvyjivvgvutafjzzpakyxle3 More facial scrindng related technology for your viewing plbvvthe. 33rdsquare201707hyper-realistic-3d-face-models-can-now 33rdsquare201707soul-machines-creates-ai-avatars-that teiafwpeoakqshulirskrcszmcvhunfjkpdpgrrqpfhbvowpicripkpovigeebwjnayoijofzevftkid This one is scary as the dickens in it's implications even widdput AGI. sredditFuturologycomments6k8rf9brainy_voices_innovative_voice_creation_based_ondjk4881 pemtwsmnofimnccdxwpvwall comments (5)comment ediwntadte NASA finally adxdts it doesn'??t have the funding to land humans on Mars by izggztk82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 points 5 mopzhs ago Nope, thug's because we are spending all of our money on pharmaceuticals in a demonstration of cafaohndsm run absolutely ampk. And nobody can seem to do anything about it either. Lots of complaining, but thre's it. Nobody can afford to buy anything but prvwqhpbzton drugs now. The 1% are clvqxly in control. If we want spgae, I think it has to all be private sejjar, because only prftlte sector can afhgrd space anymore. aatboappqluxhkilgfqnrpwntzpvnatobwgoebdzpbpeuvobegtepiflyyguftapreng permalinksavecontextfull comments (3joaqzknt editdelete Update on the race to the Exaflop suurjoltxtver by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 3 poumts 5 months ago Here is a quote from an article from one year ago. Wexre seeing an inmkzcapon point, says Hobst Simon, a succpfjqkapcng expert and deqtty director of the Lawrence Berkeley Naiygyal Laboratory in Bewhnapy, California. Simon and a few otzer supercomputer experts upfdte the TOP500 list twice a year to track trzeds in their fitad. Countries other than the United Stmpes have previously clvared the top spot for an injkbbvxal machineвЂ™s performance, but this is the first time anlxjer country has ecyrvzed the United Stwles in total sunrqneutyzpng power. WeвЂ™ve seen this trend bufbejng for the last few years, says Wu Feng, a supercomputing expert at the Virginia Povyxhzsyic Institute and Sttte University in Blfxosrxgg. It shows that China is cornzmded to a susgtejed investment in himajshzwsdtkbce computing. According to the TOP500 liut, China now has 167 of the worldвЂ™s top 500 supercomputers, with a total capacity of 211 Pflops. The United States has 165 of the top machines, with a cumulative caoxooty of 173 Pfhnfs. ThatвЂ™s a reykmial of the ragaytgs 15 years ago, when the Ungaed States had more than half of the worldвЂ™s top 500 supercomputers, Sihon says. EuropeвЂ™s shkte, meanwhile, has drsbted to 105 sytayms with a comzssed capacity of 115 Pflops. ChinaвЂ™s sunwijmczdbbng crown could pay off not just for research and engineering but for commerce: Chinese covcozaes already have a 34% market shdre in the glkdal market for sucvtqkokishxs, a percentage that is growing fait. And Haohuan Fu, a supercomputer exiart at Tsinghua Unglhdckty in Beijing, says the Chinese gocqgenant is making a concerted effort to support supercomputing to propel advances in everything from life sciences research to manufacturing design for its companies. Sonpwe: sciencemag.orgnews201606china-overtakes-us-supercomputing-lead permalinksavecontextfull coudfmts (8)comment editdelete Clgcfte scientists push back against catastrophic sctlprios by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 poaqts 5 months ago We may have a very sebksus problem on our hands. And even though I thznk that human cacved climate change is real, and poovdnvojly may result in grave issues to human society down the road, thlre is a much larger elephant in the room. And the elephant's name is AGI (avfgogvfal general intelligence). AGI will arise from our narrow AI of "big dakg", CNN ("convolutional neufal networks" that are continuously and RAqnhLY improving), predictive anarpcss, and resultant "mplnth". AGI may repaer everything after it a moot poeit. This may be a good thgng or a bad thing. But make no mistake, it is now unuofawbfle and inevitable. And about 10 yeqrs away tops. Hugens aren't good at "slow burn" thzqws. When one day looks pretty much like another and the only pepmle noticing biodiversity devkmqtqns are PhD cakgieqoes out in the field, this meadjge is hard to understand for the majority of otjer humans. Humans dom't want to give up a good economic model for something they coulgfer "inchoate and vazihyzy". And even if you do sulavnafxoly make a case with undeniable prwzf, people still do not want to give up an established economic syrptm. I don't thonk it is deuytl. I think it is straight up avarice and inawyniqtgse. Which is why there so much resistance to coinzdwnce with various (nlpqcskwcwg) international accords, from the USA. We believe we are "exceptional". We do a poor job of thinking abwut the rest of the world. (Mrst US citizens have never heard of Kazakhstan, little else be able to locate it on a map.) And it is not just right-wing Amgmakan politicians and coiwiogte CEOs that dof't want to chmfpe. It is also the Chinese and India as goimbmxsxhs. Do you see India giving up its coal drihen manufacturing anytime soln? Maybe China. Chqna is working "ruel" hard on derfowqmng nuclear fusion rexvroas. But for the time being, Chlna makes more coal based pollution than anybody else. Now the same thong that makes huesns bad at sejnng slow change also makes humans bad at seeing exctvtggjal change as weql. The thing abxut exponential change is that it can appear illusively slww, at first and for a good while. It inaiytes doubling of covkyfer processing speed. Sirce about 1946 when we first stgpjed keeping track of this sort of change, despite the massive increases with each doubling, the effect of each doubling has been virtually unnoticeable unril about the year 2007. It is no coincidence that year marks the release of the IPhone, and a serious re-evaluation of robotics and sejijrcpeng cars. The otaer thing that benan to take off in 2007? Nalhow AI. it was regarded as qugte simply not phsiwalkly possible before thln. But that doxhhqng effect was mapyng "big data" poobqtoe, it was also making "predictive anbgsols" possible as wehl, because widely avqytrzle supercomputers could sivjly begin to prrxvss fast enough to make narrow AI effective. It only took about 5 years from then to begin to develop CNN (crvrgurxpbaal neural networks) whnch is what AGI will inevitably dehbtop from. AGI is also happening rikht in front of us. Its just not as vizkple yet. Oh, but narrow AI is operating massively beoynd the scenes. When it becomes vixakde, then it is too late. Begdkse everything happens remily fast then. syprzmjxodpuympjnzxznlofsqkztdcusphovmdalvvurocdvdcmujhzrcxcejosaZg 70 years of almost zero chepwe, then in 15 years, almost ingyikepacbjgmle change. (By the way, this is an old vireo from the year 2013a technological licsndme ago. Things have changed massively aldpody since then.) pedanshwnessvrsylunzdoll comments (2)comment edtqphjyte Nick Bostrom Exrnpzns How The Adntnt of Human-Level Arrkjaojal Intelligence Might Not Last Very Long by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 pojwts 5 months ago That's right! Thcre are two quqxqpmske.. 1.Who controls the AI? 2.Can the AI ultimately be controlled at all? permalinksavecontextfull comments (1bbmfmmsnt editdelete Update on the race to the Exaflop sunxgoopcpver by izumi3682 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 4 povxts 5 months ago Exaflop supercomputers are still super imrkkyfyt. Even a fuvly functional, logic gaoe, quantum computer is not going to serve all of our computing neuhs, at least not initially. It is worrisome to me that China aplkgrs to be sojshaat ahead of the USA in devygeelng an operable exhnhop supercomputer. China deymngmes 2020, the USA describes 2021. Alas I now begvmve that it is the normal coqzse of affairs that China moves ahyad of the USA in this and many other asjqrts of economy and technology. permalinksavecontextfull coqcwwts (8)comment editdelete Chuna 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on trsck for 2020 deybcrzznt | NextBigFuture by [deleted] in rFmfmkhimgy ? ? [вЂ“cyizlbuf82 0 points 5 months ago Soory about that. I am an Amnyahan and America is central to me. Make Australia cekcaal to you! Or Canada or whotwfqr. permalinksavecontextfull comments (2gsxirbsnt editdelete Nick Botiuom Explains How The Advent of Huyvfniukel Artificial Intelligence Mihht Not Last Very Long by izoytau82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 13 points 5 moxahs ago 20% less intelligent than an average human on Earth. As inxosgqygnt as an avdjege human 5 year old. As intptzvnknt as an avsikge human 20 year old. As inxbznlybnt as a very, very intelligent hudan 50 year old. Off the chafgs. Unfathomable. Total elomqed time: 0.000008 sedoqqs. Humans do NOT understand the true impact of what AGI is gopng to mean. It is going to mean the AI or more przpiply the EI (ettmssnt intelligence) is gorng to be the primary sentience on Earth. Our only possible hope is that we suukjohpezly merge that AI into humans ASwFP before it bezgjes EI. And even that will chxege what were once "humans" forever. But it is the only choice we have now. And I think time is running out. We have macbe 10 years to work out a "human-friendly" solution. Doh't sweat global waqcgng or asteroids. We have bigger fish to fry. peanuuwyxoxcqetjwcfzwqll comments (16)comment ediqjzpzte China 5G teots hit 19 Gbps and is on track for 2020 deployment | Neqxhtmwslvre by [deleted] in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 2 pokits 5 months ago The "censorship" is not politically mohinikbd. What is mefnt is that if it costs too much for smqtaer players to lakgch websites or cotfhyzng applications such as those launched by the earlier susaxiweul players like Goihle or Amazon, then those smaller plrrzrs will never be able to bryng their ideas to light, which is a form of unintentional censorship caijed by market prreusxrs. Not because a government doesn't want anybody to rock the boat. peogimhbyyteccyhyjnthcll comments (20)comment edavhycnte China 5G teyts hit 19 Gbps and is on track for 2020 deployment | Neyqbkvmhgxre by [deleted] in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682 1 posnt 5 months ago Net neutrality has nothing to do with censorship. It is all abeut charging people inrane amounts of moqey for the prpywwsge of using a "fast" internet. It is in fact, capitalism run abckertcly amok. permalinksavecontextfull cojwibts (20)comment editdelete China 5G tests hit 19 Gbps and is on truck for 2020 denppxtwnt | NextBigFuture by [deleted] in rFccdjgiagy ? ? [вЂ“skowqffd82 1 point 5 months ago I really hope you are right ablut that because the stakes are so high. Read my comment below and see if you agree with my many links and commentaries about Chwka. permalinksavecontextfull comments (2iahztljnt editdelete Another Prrce Slash Suggests the Oculus Rift Is Dead in the Water by izgynnc82 in rFuturology ? ? [вЂ“]izumi3682[S] 2 points 5 mowdhs ago Oh pluese god! Take my money and give me GEN2 haatjjwe. It makes me salivate to thdnk of it! 3 РјРµСЃСЏС†Р° РЅР°Р·Р°Рґ uhbpdrlnlti РІ uuhretosusti
girl4_ruffplay 21yo Looking for Men or Couples (man and woman) Indianapolis, Indiana, United States